Testing latest pari + WASM + node.js... and it works?! Wow.
License: GPL3
ubuntu2004
Function: ellgroup Section: elliptic_curves C-Name: ellgroup0 Prototype: GDGD0,L, Help: ellgroup(E,{p},{flag}): given an elliptic curve E defined over a finite field Fq, return the structure of the group E(Fq); for other fields of definition K, p must define a finite residue field (p prime for K = Qp or Q; p a maximal ideal for K a number field) and we return the structure of the (nonsingular) reduction of E. If flag is 1, return also generators, the curve equation must be minimal at p. Doc: Let \kbd{E} be an \kbd{ell} structure as output by \kbd{ellinit}, attached to an elliptic curve $E/K$. We first describle the function when the field $K = \F_q$ is finite, it computes the structure of the finite abelian group $E(\F_q)$: \item if $\fl = 0$, return the structure $[]$ (trivial group) or $[d_1]$ (nontrivial cyclic group) or $[d_1,d_2]$ (noncyclic group) of $E(\F_q) \sim \Z/d_1\Z \times \Z/d_2\Z$, with $d_2\mid d_1$. \item if $\fl = 1$, return a triple $[h,\var{cyc},\var{gen}]$, where $h$ is the curve cardinality, \var{cyc} gives the group structure as a product of cyclic groups (as per $\fl = 0$). More precisely, if $d_2 > 1$, the output is $[d_1d_2, [d_1,d_2], [P,Q]]$ where $P$ is of order $d_1$ and $[P,Q]$ generates the curve. \misctitle{Caution} It is not guaranteed that $Q$ has order $d_2$, which in the worst case requires an expensive discrete log computation. Only that \kbd{ellweilpairing}$(E, P, Q, d_1)$ has order $d_2$. For other fields of definition and $p$ defining a finite residue field $\F_q$, return the structure of the reduction of $E$: the argument $p$ is best left omitted if $K = \Q_\ell$ (else we must have $p = \ell$) and must be a prime number ($K = \Q$) or prime ideal ($K$ a general number field) with residue field $\F_q$ otherwise. The curve is allowed to have bad reduction at $p$ and in this case we consider the (cyclic) group of nonsingular points for the reduction of a minimal model at $p$. If $\fl = 0$, the equation not be minimal or even integral at $p$; of course, a minimal model will be more efficient. If $\fl = 1$, the requested generators depend on the model, which must then be minimal at $p$, otherwise an exception is thrown. Use \kbd{ellintegralmodel} and/or \kbd{ellocalred} first to reduce to this case. \bprog ? E = ellinit([0,1]); \\ y^2 = x^3 + 0.x + 1, defined over Q ? ellgroup(E, 7) %2 = [6, 2] \\ Z/6 x Z/2, noncyclic ? E = ellinit([0,1] * Mod(1,11)); \\ defined over F_11 ? ellgroup(E) \\ no need to repeat 11 %4 = [12] ? ellgroup(E, 11) \\ ... but it also works %5 = [12] ? ellgroup(E, 13) \\ ouch, inconsistent input! *** at top-level: ellgroup(E,13) *** ^-------------- *** ellgroup: inconsistent moduli in Rg_to_Fp: 11 13 ? ellgroup(E, 7, 1) %6 = [12, [6, 2], [[Mod(2, 7), Mod(4, 7)], [Mod(4, 7), Mod(4, 7)]]] @eprog\noindent Let us now consider curves of bad reduction, in this case we return the structure of the (cyclic) group of nonsingular points, satisfying $\#E_{ns}(\F_p) = p - a_p$: \bprog ? E = ellinit([0,5]); ? ellgroup(E, 5, 1) %2 = [5, [5], [[Mod(4, 5), Mod(2, 5)]]] ? ellap(E, 5) %3 = 0 \\ additive reduction at 5 ? E = ellinit([0,-1,0,35,0]); ? ellgroup(E, 5, 1) %5 = [4, [4], [[Mod(2, 5), Mod(2, 5)]]] ? ellap(E, 5) %6 = 1 \\ split multiplicative reduction at 5 ? ellgroup(E, 7, 1) %7 = [8, [8], [[Mod(3, 7), Mod(5, 7)]]] ? ellap(E, 7) %8 = -1 \\ nonsplit multiplicative reduction at 7 @eprog Variant: Also available is \fun{GEN}{ellgroup}{GEN E, GEN p}, corresponding to \fl = 0.