Example13.1
Obviously, all finite groups are finitely generated. For example, the group is generated by the permutations and The group is an infinite group but is finitely generated by
📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources
Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand
In our investigation of cyclic groups we found that every group of prime order was isomorphic to where was a prime number. We also determined that when In fact, much more is true. Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of prime power order; that is, every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a group of the type
where each is prime (not necessarily distinct).
First, let us examine a slight generalization of finite abelian groups. Suppose that is a group and let be a set of elements in where is in some index set (not necessarily finite). The smallest subgroup of containing all of the 's is the subgroup of by the 's. If this subgroup of is in fact all of then is generated by the set In this case the 's are said to be the of If there is a finite set that generates then is .
Obviously, all finite groups are finitely generated. For example, the group is generated by the permutations and The group is an infinite group but is finitely generated by
Not all groups are finitely generated. Consider the rational numbers under the operation of addition. Suppose that is finitely generated with generators where each is a fraction expressed in its lowest terms. Let be some prime that does not divide any of the denominators We claim that cannot be in the subgroup of that is generated by since does not divide the denominator of any element in this subgroup. This fact is easy to see since the sum of any two generators is
Let be the subgroup of a group that is generated by Then exactly when it is a product of the form
where the s are not necessarily distinct.
Let be the set of all products of the form where the s are not necessarily distinct. Certainly is a subset of We need only show that is a subgroup of If this is the case, then since is the smallest subgroup containing all the s.
Clearly, the set is closed under the group operation. Since the identity is in It remains to show that the inverse of an element in must also be in However,
The reason that powers of a fixed may occur several times in the product is that we may have a nonabelian group. However, if the group is abelian, then the s need occur only once. For example, a product such as in an abelian group could always be simplified (in this case, to ).
Now let us restrict our attention to finite abelian groups. We can express any finite abelian group as a finite direct product of cyclic groups. More specifically, letting be prime, we define a group to be a if every element in has as its order a power of For example, both and are -groups, whereas is a -group. We shall prove the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups which tells us that every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic -groups.
Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of the form
here the 's are primes (not necessarily distinct).
Suppose that we wish to classify all abelian groups of order The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups tells us that we have the following six possibilities.
The proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups depends on several lemmas.
Let be a finite abelian group of order If is a prime that divides then contains an element of order
We will prove this lemma by induction. If then there is nothing to show. Now suppose that the order of is the lemma is true for all groups of order where Furthermore, let be a prime that divides
If has no proper nontrivial subgroups, then where is any element other than the identity. By Exercise 4.4.39, the order of must be prime. Since divides we know that and contains elements of order
Now suppose that contains a nontrivial proper subgroup Then If then contains an element of order by induction and the lemma is true. Suppose that does not divide the order of Since is abelian, it must be the case that is a normal subgroup of and Consequently, must divide Since we know that contains an element of order by the induction hypothesis. Thus,
and but If then and are relatively prime, and there exist integers and such that Furthermore, the order of must divide and
We claim that has order We must show that Suppose Then
Since it must be the case that which is a contradiction. Therefore, is an element of order in
A finite abelian group is a -group if and only if its order is a power of
If then by Lagrange’s theorem, then the order of any must divide and therefore must be a power of Conversely, if is not a power of then it has some other prime divisor so by Lemma 13.6, has an element of order and thus is not a -group.
Let be a finite abelian group of order where where are distinct primes and are positive integers. Then is the internal direct product of subgroups where is the subgroup of consisting of all elements of order for some integer
Since is an abelian group, we are guaranteed that is a subgroup of for Since the identity has order we know that If has order then must also have order Finally, if has order then
where is the maximum of and
We must show that
and for Suppose that is in the subgroup generated by Then for Since has order we know that for and Since the order of is a power of and it must be the case that and the intersection of with any of the subgroups is the identity. A similar argument shows that for
Next, we must show that it possible to write every as a product where Since the order of divides the order of we know that
for some integers Letting the 's are relatively prime; hence, there exist integers such that Consequently,
Since
it follows that must be in Let Then Therefore, is an internal direct product of subgroups.
If remains for us to determine the possible structure of each -group in Lemma 13.8.
Let be a finite abelian -group and suppose that has maximal order. Then is isomorphic to for some subgroup of
By Lemma 13.7, we may assume that the order of is We shall induct on If then is cyclic of order and must be generated by Suppose now that the statement of the lemma holds for all integers with and let be of maximal order in say Then for all Now choose in such that where has the smallest possible order. Certainly such an exists; otherwise, and we are done. Let
We claim that It suffices to show that Since the order of is smaller than the order of and must be in by the minimality of that is, for some number Hence,
and the order of must be less than or equal to Therefore, cannot generate Notice that must occur as a factor of say and Define to be Then cannot be in otherwise, would also have to be in Also,
We have now formed an element with order such that Since was chosen to have the smallest order of all of the elements that are not in
Now we will show that the order of in the factor group must be the same as the order of in If then
hence, must be in which contradicts the fact that the order of is Therefore, must have maximal order in By the Correspondence Theorem and our induction hypothesis,
for some subgroup of containing We claim that If then and It follows that implies that
The proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups follows very quickly from Lemma 13.9. Suppose that is a finite abelian group and let be an element of maximal order in If then we are done; otherwise, for some subgroup contained in by the lemma. Since we can apply mathematical induction.
We now state the more general theorem for all finitely generated abelian groups. The proof of this theorem can be found in any of the references at the end of this chapter.
Every finitely generated abelian group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of the form
where the 's are primes (not necessarily distinct).