Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download

📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources

132928 views
License: OTHER
Kernel:
%%html <link href="http://mathbook.pugetsound.edu/beta/mathbook-content.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://aimath.org/mathbook/mathbook-add-on.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <style>.subtitle {font-size:medium; display:block}</style> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,400italic,600,600italic" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Inconsolata:400,700&subset=latin,latin-ext" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><!-- Hide this cell. --> <script> var cell = $(".container .cell").eq(0), ia = cell.find(".input_area") if (cell.find(".toggle-button").length == 0) { ia.after( $('<button class="toggle-button">Toggle hidden code</button>').click( function (){ ia.toggle() } ) ) ia.hide() } </script>

Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.

ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand

Section16.4Maximal and Prime Ideals

In this particular section we are especially interested in certain ideals of commutative rings. These ideals give us special types of factor rings. More specifically, we would like to characterize those ideals II of a commutative ring RR such that R/IR/I is an integral domain or a field.

A proper ideal MM of a ring RR is a of RR if the ideal MM is not a proper subset of any ideal of RR except RR itself. That is, MM is a maximal ideal if for any ideal II properly containing M,M\text{,} I=R.I = R\text{.} The following theorem completely characterizes maximal ideals for commutative rings with identity in terms of their corresponding factor rings.

Theorem16.35

Let RR be a commutative ring with identity and MM an ideal in R.R\text{.} Then MM is a maximal ideal of RR if and only if R/MR/M is a field.

Proof

Let MM be a maximal ideal in R.R\text{.} If RR is a commutative ring, then R/MR/M must also be a commutative ring. Clearly, 1+M1 + M acts as an identity for R/M.R/M\text{.} We must also show that every nonzero element in R/MR/M has an inverse. If a+Ma + M is a nonzero element in R/M,R/M\text{,} then aM.a \notin M\text{.} Define II to be the set {ra+m:rR and mM}.\{ ra + m : r \in R \text{ and } m \in M \}\text{.} We will show that II is an ideal in R.R\text{.} The set II is nonempty since 0a+0=00a+0=0 is in I.I\text{.} If r1a+m1r_1 a + m_1 and r2a+m2r_2 a + m_2 are two elements in I,I\text{,} then

(r1a+m1)(r2a+m2)=(r1r2)a+(m1m2)\begin{equation*} (r_1 a + m_1) - ( r_2 a + m_2) = (r_1 - r_2)a + (m_1 - m_2) \end{equation*}

is in I.I\text{.} Also, for any rRr \in R it is true that rII;rI \subset I\text{;} hence, II is closed under multiplication and satisfies the necessary conditions to be an ideal. Therefore, by Proposition 16.10 and the definition of an ideal, II is an ideal properly containing M.M\text{.} Since MM is a maximal ideal, I=R;I=R\text{;} consequently, by the definition of II there must be an mm in MM and an element bb in RR such that 1=ab+m.1=ab+m\text{.} Therefore,

1+M=ab+M=ba+M=(a+M)(b+M).\begin{equation*} 1 + M = ab + M = ba + M = (a+M)(b+M). \end{equation*}

Conversely, suppose that MM is an ideal and R/MR/M is a field. Since R/MR/M is a field, it must contain at least two elements: 0+M=M0 + M = M and 1+M.1 + M\text{.} Hence, MM is a proper ideal of R.R\text{.} Let II be any ideal properly containing M.M\text{.} We need to show that I=R.I = R\text{.} Choose aa in II but not in M.M\text{.} Since a+Ma+ M is a nonzero element in a field, there exists an element b+Mb +M in R/MR/M such that (a+M)(b+M)=ab+M=1+M.(a+M)(b+M) = ab + M = 1+M\text{.} Consequently, there exists an element mMm \in M such that ab+m=1ab + m = 1 and 11 is in I.I\text{.} Therefore, r1=rIr1 =r \in I for all rR.r \in R\text{.} Consequently, I=R.I = R\text{.}

Example16.36

Let pZp{\mathbb Z} be an ideal in Z,{\mathbb Z}\text{,} where pp is prime. Then pZp{\mathbb Z} is a maximal ideal since Z/pZZp{\mathbb Z}/ p {\mathbb Z} \cong {\mathbb Z}_p is a field.

A proper ideal PP in a commutative ring RR is called a if whenever abP,ab \in P\text{,} then either aPa \in P or bP.b \in P\text{.} 5 It is possible to define prime ideals in a noncommutative ring. See [1] or [3].

Example16.37

It is easy to check that the set P={0,2,4,6,8,10}P = \{ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 \} is an ideal in Z12.{\mathbb Z}_{12}\text{.} This ideal is prime. In fact, it is a maximal ideal.

Proposition16.38

Let RR be a commutative ring with identity 1,1\text{,} where 10.1 \neq 0\text{.} Then PP is a prime ideal in RR if and only if R/PR/P is an integral domain.

Proof

First let us assume that PP is an ideal in RR and R/PR/P is an integral domain. Suppose that abP.ab \in P\text{.} If a+Pa + P and b+Pb + P are two elements of R/PR/P such that (a+P)(b+P)=0+P=P,(a + P)(b + P) = 0 + P = P\text{,} then either a+P=Pa + P = P or b+P=P.b + P = P\text{.} This means that either aa is in PP or bb is in P,P\text{,} which shows that PP must be prime.

Conversely, suppose that PP is prime and

(a+P)(b+P)=ab+P=0+P=P.\begin{equation*} (a + P)(b + P) = ab + P = 0 + P = P. \end{equation*}

Then abP.ab \in P\text{.} If aP,a \notin P\text{,} then bb must be in PP by the definition of a prime ideal; hence, b+P=0+Pb + P = 0 + P and R/PR/P is an integral domain.

Example16.39

Every ideal in Z{\mathbb Z} is of the form nZ.n {\mathbb Z}\text{.} The factor ring Z/nZZn{\mathbb Z} / n{\mathbb Z} \cong {\mathbb Z}_n is an integral domain only when nn is prime. It is actually a field. Hence, the nonzero prime ideals in Z{\mathbb Z} are the ideals pZ,p{\mathbb Z}\text{,} where pp is prime. This example really justifies the use of the word “prime” in our definition of prime ideals.

Since every field is an integral domain, we have the following corollary.

Corollary16.40

Every maximal ideal in a commutative ring with identity is also a prime ideal.

SubsectionHistorical Note

Amalie Emmy Noether, one of the outstanding mathematicians of the twentieth century, was born in Erlangen, Germany in 1882. She was the daughter of Max Noether (1844–1921), a distinguished mathematician at the University of Erlangen. Together with Paul Gordon (1837–1912), Emmy Noether's father strongly influenced her early education. She entered the University of Erlangen at the age of 18. Although women had been admitted to universities in England, France, and Italy for decades, there was great resistance to their presence at universities in Germany. Noether was one of only two women among the university's 986 students. After completing her doctorate under Gordon in 1907, she continued to do research at Erlangen, occasionally lecturing when her father was ill.

Noether went to Göttingen to study in 1916. David Hilbert and Felix Klein tried unsuccessfully to secure her an appointment at Göttingen. Some of the faculty objected to women lecturers, saying, “What will our soldiers think when they return to the university and are expected to learn at the feet of a woman?” Hilbert, annoyed at the question, responded, “Meine Herren, I do not see that the sex of a candidate is an argument against her admission as a Privatdozent. After all, the Senate is not a bathhouse.” At the end of World War I, attitudes changed and conditions greatly improved for women. After Noether passed her habilitation examination in 1919, she was given a title and was paid a small sum for her lectures.

In 1922, Noether became a Privatdozent at Göttingen. Over the next 11 years she used axiomatic methods to develop an abstract theory of rings and ideals. Though she was not good at lecturing, Noether was an inspiring teacher. One of her many students was B. L. van der Waerden, author of the first text treating abstract algebra from a modern point of view. Some of the other mathematicians Noether influenced or closely worked with were Alexandroff, Artin, Brauer, Courant, Hasse, Hopf, Pontryagin, von Neumann, and Weyl. One of the high points of her career was an invitation to address the International Congress of Mathematicians in Zurich in 1932. In spite of all the recognition she received from her colleagues, Noether's abilities were never recognized as they should have been during her lifetime. She was never promoted to full professor by the Prussian academic bureaucracy.

In 1933, Noether, a Jew, was banned from participation in all academic activities in Germany. She emigrated to the United States, took a position at Bryn Mawr College, and became a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton. Noether died suddenly on April 14, 1935. After her death she was eulogized by such notable scientists as Albert Einstein.