Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download

📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources

132928 views
License: OTHER
Kernel:
%%html <link href="http://mathbook.pugetsound.edu/beta/mathbook-content.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://aimath.org/mathbook/mathbook-add-on.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <style>.subtitle {font-size:medium; display:block}</style> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,400italic,600,600italic" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Inconsolata:400,700&subset=latin,latin-ext" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><!-- Hide this cell. --> <script> var cell = $(".container .cell").eq(0), ia = cell.find(".input_area") if (cell.find(".toggle-button").length == 0) { ia.after( $('<button class="toggle-button">Toggle hidden code</button>').click( function (){ ia.toggle() } ) ) ia.hide() } </script>

Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.

ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand

Section15.2Examples and Applications

¶
Example15.9

Using the Sylow Theorems, we can determine that A5A_5 has subgroups of orders 2,2\text{,} 3,3\text{,} 4,4\text{,} and 5.5\text{.} The Sylow pp-subgroups of A5A_5 have orders 3,3\text{,} 4,4\text{,} and 5.5\text{.} The Third Sylow Theorem tells us exactly how many Sylow pp-subgroups A5A_5 has. Since the number of Sylow 5-subgroups must divide 60 and also be congruent to 1(mod5),1 \pmod{5}\text{,} there are either one or six Sylow 5-subgroups in A5.A_5\text{.} All Sylow 5-subgroups are conjugate. If there were only a single Sylow 5-subgroup, it would be conjugate to itself; that is, it would be a normal subgroup of A5.A_5\text{.} Since A5A_5 has no normal subgroups, this is impossible; hence, we have determined that there are exactly six distinct Sylow 5-subgroups of A5.A_5\text{.}

The Sylow Theorems allow us to prove many useful results about finite groups. By using them, we can often conclude a great deal about groups of a particular order if certain hypotheses are satisfied.

Theorem15.10

If pp and qq are distinct primes with p<q,p \lt q \text{,} then every group GG of order pqpq has a single subgroup of order qq and this subgroup is normal in G.G\text{.} Hence, GG cannot be simple. Furthermore, if q≢1(modp),q \not\equiv 1 \pmod{p}\text{,} then GG is cyclic.

Proof

We know that GG contains a subgroup HH of order q.q\text{.} The number of conjugates of HH divides pqpq and is equal to 1+kq1 + kq for k=0,1,….k = 0, 1, \ldots\text{.} However, 1+q1 + q is already too large to divide the order of the group; hence, HH can only be conjugate to itself. That is, HH must be normal in G.G\text{.}

The group GG also has a Sylow pp-subgroup, say K.K\text{.} The number of conjugates of KK must divide qq and be equal to 1+kp1 + kp for k=0,1,….k = 0, 1, \ldots\text{.} Since qq is prime, either 1+kp=q1 + kp = q or 1+kp=1.1 + kp = 1\text{.} If 1+kp=1,1 + kp = 1\text{,} then KK is normal in G.G\text{.} In this case, we can easily show that GG satisfies the criteria, given in Chapter 9, for the internal direct product of HH and K.K\text{.} Since HH is isomorphic to Zq{\mathbb Z}_q and KK is isomorphic to Zp,{\mathbb Z}_p\text{,} G≅Zp×Zq≅ZpqG \cong {\mathbb Z}_p \times {\mathbb Z}_q \cong {\mathbb Z}_{pq} by Theorem 9.21.

Example15.11

Every group of order 15 is cyclic. This is true because 15=5⋅315 = 5 \cdot 3 and 5≢1(mod3).5 \not\equiv 1 \pmod{3}\text{.}

Example15.12

Let us classify all of the groups of order 99=32⋅1199 = 3^2 \cdot 11 up to isomorphism. First we will show that every group GG of order 99 is abelian. By the Third Sylow Theorem, there are 1+3k1 + 3k Sylow 3-subgroups, each of order 9,9\text{,} for some k=0,1,2,….k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\text{.} Also, 1+3k1 + 3k must divide 11; hence, there can only be a single normal Sylow 3-subgroup HH in G.G\text{.} Similarly, there are 1+11k1 +11k Sylow 11-subgroups and 1+11k1 +11k must divide 9.9\text{.} Consequently, there is only one Sylow 11-subgroup KK in G.G\text{.} By Corollary 14.16, any group of order p2p^2 is abelian for pp prime; hence, HH is isomorphic either to Z3×Z3{\mathbb Z}_3 \times {\mathbb Z}_3 or to Z9.{\mathbb Z}_9\text{.} Since KK has order 11, it must be isomorphic to Z11.{\mathbb Z}_{11}\text{.} Therefore, the only possible groups of order 99 are Z3×Z3×Z11{\mathbb Z}_3 \times {\mathbb Z}_3 \times {\mathbb Z}_{11} or Z9×Z11{\mathbb Z}_9 \times {\mathbb Z}_{11} up to isomorphism.

To determine all of the groups of order 5â‹…7â‹…47=1645,5 \cdot 7 \cdot 47 = 1645\text{,} we need the following theorem.

Theorem15.13

Let G′=⟨aba−1b−1:a,b∈G⟩G' = \langle a b a^{-1} b^{-1} : a, b \in G \rangle be the subgroup consisting of all finite products of elements of the form aba−1b−1aba^{-1}b^{-1} in a group G.G\text{.} Then G′G' is a normal subgroup of GG and G/G′G/G' is abelian.

The subgroup G′G' of GG is called the of G.G\text{.} We leave the proof of this theorem as an exercise (Exercise 10.3.14 in Chapter 10).

Example15.14

We will now show that every group of order 5⋅7⋅47=16455 \cdot 7 \cdot 47 = 1645 is abelian, and cyclic by Corollary 9.21. By the Third Sylow Theorem, GG has only one subgroup H1H_1 of order 47.47\text{.} So G/H1G/H_1 has order 35 and must be abelian by Theorem 15.10. Hence, the commutator subgroup of GG is contained in HH which tells us that ∣G′∣|G'| is either 1 or 47. If ∣G′∣=1,|G'|=1\text{,} we are done. Suppose that ∣G′∣=47.|G'|=47\text{.} The Third Sylow Theorem tells us that GG has only one subgroup of order 5 and one subgroup of order 7. So there exist normal subgroups H2H_2 and H3H_3 in G,G\text{,} where ∣H2∣=5|H_2| = 5 and ∣H3∣=7.|H_3| = 7\text{.} In either case the quotient group is abelian; hence, G′G' must be a subgroup of Hi,H_i\text{,} i=1,2.i= 1, 2\text{.} Therefore, the order of G′G' is 1, 5, or 7. However, we already have determined that ∣G′∣=1|G'| =1 or 47. So the commutator subgroup of GG is trivial, and consequently GG is abelian.

SubsectionFinite Simple Groups

¶

Given a finite group, one can ask whether or not that group has any normal subgroups. Recall that a simple group is one with no proper nontrivial normal subgroups. As in the case of A5,A_5\text{,} proving a group to be simple can be a very difficult task; however, the Sylow Theorems are useful tools for proving that a group is not simple. Usually, some sort of counting argument is involved.

Example15.15

Let us show that no group GG of order 20 can be simple. By the Third Sylow Theorem, GG contains one or more Sylow 55-subgroups. The number of such subgroups is congruent to 1(mod5)1 \pmod{5} and must also divide 20. The only possible such number is 1. Since there is only a single Sylow 5-subgroup and all Sylow 5-subgroups are conjugate, this subgroup must be normal.

Example15.16

Let GG be a finite group of order pn,p^n\text{,} n>1n \gt 1 and pp prime. By Theorem 14.15, GG has a nontrivial center. Since the center of any group GG is a normal subgroup, GG cannot be a simple group. Therefore, groups of orders 4, 8, 9, 16, 25, 27, 32, 49, 64, and 81 are not simple. In fact, the groups of order 4, 9, 25, and 49 are abelian by Corollary 14.16.

Example15.17

No group of order 56=23â‹…756= 2^3 \cdot 7 is simple. We have seen that if we can show that there is only one Sylow pp-subgroup for some prime pp dividing 56, then this must be a normal subgroup and we are done. By the Third Sylow Theorem, there are either one or eight Sylow 7-subgroups. If there is only a single Sylow 7-subgroup, then it must be normal.

On the other hand, suppose that there are eight Sylow 7-subgroups. Then each of these subgroups must be cyclic; hence, the intersection of any two of these subgroups contains only the identity of the group. This leaves 8â‹…6=488 \cdot 6 = 48 distinct elements in the group, each of order 7. Now let us count Sylow 2-subgroups. There are either one or seven Sylow 2-subgroups. Any element of a Sylow 2-subgroup other than the identity must have as its order a power of 2; and therefore cannot be one of the 48 elements of order 7 in the Sylow 7-subgroups. Since a Sylow 2-subgroup has order 8, there is only enough room for a single Sylow 2-subgroup in a group of order 56. If there is only one Sylow 2-subgroup, it must be normal.

For other groups G,G\text{,} it is more difficult to prove that GG is not simple. Suppose GG has order 48. In this case the technique that we employed in the last example will not work. We need the following lemma to prove that no group of order 48 is simple.

Lemma15.18

Let HH and KK be finite subgroups of a group G.G\text{.} Then

∣HK∣=∣H∣⋅∣K∣∣H∩K∣.\begin{equation*} |HK| = \frac{|H| \cdot |K|}{|H \cap K|}. \end{equation*}
Proof

Recall that

HK={hk:h∈H,k∈K}.\begin{equation*} HK = \{ hk : h \in H, k \in K \}. \end{equation*}

Certainly, ∣HK∣≤∣H∣⋅∣K∣|HK| \leq |H| \cdot |K| since some element in HKHK could be written as the product of different elements in HH and K.K\text{.} It is quite possible that h1k1=h2k2h_1 k_1 = h_2 k_2 for h1,h2∈Hh_1, h_2 \in H and k1,k2∈K.k_1, k_2 \in K\text{.} If this is the case, let

a=(h1)−1h2=k1(k2)−1.\begin{equation*} a = (h_1)^{-1} h_2 = k_1 (k_2)^{-1}. \end{equation*}

Notice that a∈H∩K,a \in H \cap K\text{,} since (h1)−1h2(h_1)^{-1} h_2 is in HH and k2(k1)−1k_2 (k_1)^{-1} is in K;K\text{;} consequently,

h2=h1a−1k2=ak1.\begin{align*} h_2 & = h_1 a^{-1}\\ k_2 & = a k_1. \end{align*}

Conversely, let h=h1b−1h = h_1 b^{-1} and k=bk1k = b k_1 for b∈H∩K.b \in H \cap K\text{.} Then hk=h1k1,h k = h_1 k_1\text{,} where h∈Hh \in H and k∈K.k \in K\text{.} Hence, any element hk∈HKhk \in HK can be written in the form hikih_i k_i for hi∈Hh_i \in H and ki∈K,k_i \in K\text{,} as many times as there are elements in H∩K;H \cap K\text{;} that is, ∣H∩K∣|H \cap K| times. Therefore, ∣HK∣=(∣H∣⋅∣K∣)/∣H∩K∣.|HK| = (|H| \cdot |K|)/|H \cap K|\text{.}

Example15.19

To demonstrate that a group GG of order 48 is not simple, we will show that GG contains either a normal subgroup of order 8 or a normal subgroup of order 16. By the Third Sylow Theorem, GG has either one or three Sylow 2-subgroups of order 16. If there is only one subgroup, then it must be a normal subgroup.

Suppose that the other case is true, and two of the three Sylow 2-subgroups are HH and K.K\text{.} We claim that ∣H∩K∣=8.|H \cap K| = 8\text{.} If ∣H∩K∣≤4,|H \cap K| \leq 4\text{,} then by Lemma 15.18,

∣HK∣=16⋅164=64,\begin{equation*} |HK| = \frac{16 \cdot 16}{4} =64, \end{equation*}

which is impossible. Notice that H∩KH \cap K has index two in both of HH and K,K\text{,} so is normal in both, and thus HH and KK are each in the normalizer of H∩K.H \cap K\text{.} Because HH is a subgroup of N(H∩K)N(H \cap K) and because N(H∩K)N(H \cap K) has strictly more than 16 elements, ∣N(H∩K)∣|N(H \cap K)| must be a multiple of 16 greater than 1, as well as dividing 48. The only possibility is that ∣N(H∩K)∣=48.|N(H \cap K)|= 48\text{.} Hence, N(H∩K)=G.N(H \cap K) = G\text{.}

The following famous conjecture of Burnside was proved in a long and difficult paper by Feit and Thompson [2].

Theorem15.20Odd Order Theorem

Every finite simple group of nonprime order must be of even order.

The proof of this theorem laid the groundwork for a program in the 1960s and 1970s that classified all finite simple groups. The success of this program is one of the outstanding achievements of modern mathematics.