Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download

📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources

132928 views
License: OTHER
Kernel:
%%html <link href="http://mathbook.pugetsound.edu/beta/mathbook-content.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://aimath.org/mathbook/mathbook-add-on.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <style>.subtitle {font-size:medium; display:block}</style> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,400italic,600,600italic" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Inconsolata:400,700&subset=latin,latin-ext" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><!-- Hide this cell. --> <script> var cell = $(".container .cell").eq(0), ia = cell.find(".input_area") if (cell.find(".toggle-button").length == 0) { ia.after( $('<button class="toggle-button">Toggle hidden code</button>').click( function (){ ia.toggle() } ) ) ia.hide() } </script>

Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.

ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand

Section15.1The Sylow Theorems

¶

We will use what we have learned about group actions to prove the Sylow Theorems. Recall for a moment what it means for GG to act on itself by conjugation and how conjugacy classes are distributed in the group according to the class equation, discussed in Chapter 14. A group GG acts on itself by conjugation via the map (g,x)↦gxg−1.(g,x) \mapsto gxg^{-1}\text{.} Let x1,…,xkx_1, \ldots, x_k be representatives from each of the distinct conjugacy classes of GG that consist of more than one element. Then the class equation can be written as

∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+[G:C(x1)]+⋯+[G:C(xk)],\begin{equation*} |G| = |Z(G)| + [G: C(x_1) ] + \cdots + [ G: C(x_k)], \end{equation*}

where Z(G)={g∈G:gx=xg for all x∈G}Z(G) = \{g \in G : gx = xg \text{ for all } x \in G\} is the center of GG and C(xi)={g∈G:gxi=xig}C(x_i) = \{ g \in G : g x_i = x_i g \} is the centralizer subgroup of xi.x_i\text{.}

We begin our investigation of the Sylow Theorems by examining subgroups of order p,p\text{,} where pp is prime. A group GG is a if every element in GG has as its order a power of p,p\text{,} where pp is a prime number. A subgroup of a group GG is a if it is a pp-group.

Theorem15.1Cauchy

Let GG be a finite group and pp a prime such that pp divides the order of G.G\text{.} Then GG contains a subgroup of order p.p\text{.}

Proof

We will use induction on the order of G.G\text{.} If ∣G∣=p,|G|=p\text{,} then clearly GG itself is the required subgroup. We now assume that every group of order k,k\text{,} where p≤k<np \leq k \lt n and pp divides k,k\text{,} has an element of order p.p\text{.} Assume that ∣G∣=n|G|= n and p∣np \mid n and consider the class equation of G:G\text{:}

∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+[G:C(x1)]+⋯+[G:C(xk)].\begin{equation*} |G| = |Z(G)| + [G: C(x_1) ] + \cdots + [ G: C(x_k)]. \end{equation*}

We have two cases.

Case 1.

Suppose the order of one of the centralizer subgroups, C(xi),C(x_i)\text{,} is divisible by pp for some i,i\text{,} i=1,…,k.i = 1, \ldots, k\text{.} In this case, by our induction hypothesis, we are done. Since C(xi)C(x_i) is a proper subgroup of GG and pp divides ∣C(xi)∣,|C(x_i)|\text{,} C(xi)C(x_i) must contain an element of order p.p\text{.} Hence, GG must contain an element of order p.p\text{.}

Case 2.

Suppose the order of no centralizer subgroup is divisible by p.p\text{.} Then pp divides [G:C(xi)],[G:C(x_i)]\text{,} the order of each conjugacy class in the class equation; hence, pp must divide the center of G,G\text{,} Z(G).Z(G)\text{.} Since Z(G)Z(G) is abelian, it must have a subgroup of order pp by the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups. Therefore, the center of GG contains an element of order p.p\text{.}

Corollary15.2

Let GG be a finite group. Then GG is a pp-group if and only if ∣G∣=pn.|G| = p^n\text{.}

Example15.3

Let us consider the group A5.A_5\text{.} We know that ∣A5∣=60=22⋅3⋅5.|A_5| = 60 = 2^2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5\text{.} By Cauchy's Theorem, we are guaranteed that A5A_5 has subgroups of orders 2,2\text{,} 33 and 5.5\text{.} The Sylow Theorems will give us even more information about the possible subgroups of A5.A_5\text{.}

We are now ready to state and prove the first of the Sylow Theorems. The proof is very similar to the proof of Cauchy's Theorem.

Theorem15.4First Sylow Theorem

Let GG be a finite group and pp a prime such that prp^r divides ∣G∣.|G|\text{.} Then GG contains a subgroup of order pr.p^r\text{.}

Proof

We induct on the order of GG once again. If ∣G∣=p,|G| = p\text{,} then we are done. Now suppose that the order of GG is nn with n>pn \gt p and that the theorem is true for all groups of order less than n,n\text{,} where pp divides n.n\text{.} We shall apply the class equation once again:

∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+[G:C(x1)]+⋯+[G:C(xk)].\begin{equation*} |G| = |Z(G)| + [G: C(x_1) ] + \cdots + [ G: C(x_k)]. \end{equation*}

First suppose that pp does not divide [G:C(xi)][G:C(x_i)] for some i.i\text{.} Then pr∣∣C(xi)∣,p^r \mid |C(x_i)|\text{,} since prp^r divides ∣G∣=∣C(xi)∣⋅[G:C(xi)].|G| = |C(x_i)| \cdot [G:C(x_i)]\text{.} Now we can apply the induction hypothesis to C(xi).C(x_i)\text{.}

Hence, we may assume that pp divides [G:C(xi)][G:C(x_i)] for all i.i\text{.} Since pp divides ∣G∣,|G|\text{,} the class equation says that pp must divide ∣Z(G)∣;|Z(G)|\text{;} hence, by Cauchy's Theorem, Z(G)Z(G) has an element of order p,p\text{,} say g.g\text{.} Let NN be the group generated by g.g\text{.} Clearly, NN is a normal subgroup of Z(G)Z(G) since Z(G)Z(G) is abelian; therefore, NN is normal in GG since every element in Z(G)Z(G) commutes with every element in G.G\text{.} Now consider the factor group G/NG/N of order ∣G∣/p.|G|/p\text{.} By the induction hypothesis, G/NG/N contains a subgroup HH of order pr−1.p^{r- 1}\text{.} The inverse image of HH under the canonical homomorphism ϕ:G→G/N\phi : G \rightarrow G/N is a subgroup of order prp^r in G.G\text{.}

A PP of a group GG is a maximal pp-subgroup of G.G\text{.} To prove the other two Sylow Theorems, we need to consider conjugate subgroups as opposed to conjugate elements in a group. For a group G,G\text{,} let S{\mathcal S} be the collection of all subgroups of G.G\text{.} For any subgroup H,H\text{,} S{\mathcal S} is a HH-set, where HH acts on S{\mathcal S} by conjugation. That is, we have an action

H×S→S\begin{equation*} H \times {\mathcal S} \rightarrow {\mathcal S} \end{equation*}

defined by

h⋅K↦hKh−1\begin{equation*} h \cdot K \mapsto hKh^{-1} \end{equation*}

for KK in S.{\mathcal S}\text{.}

The set

N(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H}\begin{equation*} N(H) = \{ g \in G : g H g^{-1} = H\} \end{equation*}

is a subgroup of GG called the the of HH in G.G\text{.} Notice that HH is a normal subgroup of N(H).N(H)\text{.} In fact, N(H)N(H) is the largest subgroup of GG in which HH is normal.

Lemma15.5

Let PP be a Sylow pp-subgroup of a finite group GG and let xx have as its order a power of p.p\text{.} If x−1Px=P,x^{-1} P x = P\text{,} then x∈P.x \in P\text{.}

Proof

Certainly x∈N(P),x \in N(P)\text{,} and the cyclic subgroup, ⟨xP⟩⊂N(P)/P,\langle xP \rangle \subset N(P)/P\text{,} has as its order a power of p.p\text{.} By the Correspondence Theorem there exists a subgroup HH of N(P)N(P) containing PP such that H/P=⟨xP⟩.H/P = \langle xP \rangle\text{.} Since ∣H∣=∣P∣⋅∣⟨xP⟩∣,|H| = |P| \cdot |\langle xP \rangle|\text{,} the order of HH must be a power of p.p\text{.} However, PP is a Sylow pp-subgroup contained in H.H\text{.} Since the order of PP is the largest power of pp dividing ∣G∣,|G|\text{,} H=P.H=P\text{.} Therefore, H/PH/P is the trivial subgroup and xP=P,xP = P\text{,} or x∈P.x \in P\text{.}

Lemma15.6

Let HH and KK be subgroups of G.G\text{.} The number of distinct HH-conjugates of KK is [H:N(K)∩H].[H:N(K) \cap H]\text{.}

Proof

We define a bijection between the conjugacy classes of KK and the right cosets of N(K)∩HN(K) \cap H by h−1Kh↦(N(K)∩H)h.h^{-1}Kh \mapsto (N(K) \cap H)h\text{.} To show that this map is a bijection, let h1,h2∈Hh_1, h_2 \in H and suppose that (N(K)∩H)h1=(N(K)∩H)h2.(N(K) \cap H)h_1 = (N(K) \cap H)h_2\text{.} Then h2h1−1∈N(K).h_2 h_1^{-1} \in N(K)\text{.} Therefore, K=h2h1−1Kh1h2−1K = h_2 h_1^{-1} K h_1 h_2^{-1} or h1−1Kh1=h2−1Kh2,h_1^{-1} K h_1 = h_2^{-1} K h_2\text{,} and the map is an injection. It is easy to see that this map is surjective; hence, we have a one-to-one and onto map between the HH-conjugates of KK and the right cosets of N(K)∩HN(K) \cap H in H.H\text{.}

Theorem15.7Second Sylow Theorem

Let GG be a finite group and pp a prime dividing ∣G∣.|G|\text{.} Then all Sylow pp-subgroups of GG are conjugate. That is, if P1P_1 and P2P_2 are two Sylow pp-subgroups, there exists a g∈Gg \in G such that gP1g−1=P2.g P_1 g^{-1} = P_2\text{.}

Proof

Let PP be a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG and suppose that ∣G∣=prm|G|=p^r m with ∣P∣=pr.|P|=p^r\text{.} Let

S={P=P1,P2,…,Pk}\begin{equation*} {\mathcal S} = \{ P = P_1, P_2, \ldots, P_k \} \end{equation*}

consist of the distinct conjugates of PP in G.G\text{.} By Lemma 15.6, k=[G:N(P)].k = [G: N(P)]\text{.} Notice that

∣G∣=prm=∣N(P)∣⋅[G:N(P)]=∣N(P)∣⋅k.\begin{equation*} |G|= p^r m = |N(P)| \cdot [G: N(P)]= |N(P)| \cdot k. \end{equation*}

Since prp^r divides ∣N(P)∣,|N(P)|\text{,} pp cannot divide k.k\text{.}

Given any other Sylow pp-subgroup Q,Q\text{,} we must show that Q∈S.Q \in {\mathcal S}\text{.} Consider the QQ-conjugacy classes of each Pi.P_i\text{.} Clearly, these conjugacy classes partition S.{\mathcal S}\text{.} The size of the partition containing PiP_i is [Q:N(Pi)∩Q][Q :N(P_i) \cap Q] by Lemma 15.6, and Lagrange's Theorem tells us that ∣Q∣=[Q:N(Pi)∩Q]∣N(Pi)∩Q∣.|Q| = [Q :N(P_i) \cap Q] |N(P_i) \cap Q|\text{.} Thus, [Q:N(Pi)∩Q][Q :N(P_i) \cap Q] must be a divisor of ∣Q∣=pr.|Q|= p^r\text{.} Hence, the number of conjugates in every equivalence class of the partition is a power of p.p\text{.} However, since pp does not divide k,k\text{,} one of these equivalence classes must contain only a single Sylow pp-subgroup, say Pj.P_j\text{.} In this case, x−1Pjx=Pjx^{-1} P_j x = P_j for all x∈Q.x \in Q\text{.} By Lemma 15.5, Pj=Q.P_j = Q\text{.}

Theorem15.8Third Sylow Theorem

Let GG be a finite group and let pp be a prime dividing the order of G.G\text{.} Then the number of Sylow pp-subgroups is congruent to 1(modp)1 \pmod{p} and divides ∣G∣.|G|\text{.}

Proof

Let PP be a Sylow pp-subgroup acting on the set of Sylow pp-subgroups,

S={P=P1,P2,…,Pk},\begin{equation*} {\mathcal S} = \{ P = P_1, P_2, \ldots, P_k \}, \end{equation*}

by conjugation. From the proof of the Second Sylow Theorem, the only PP-conjugate of PP is itself and the order of the other PP-conjugacy classes is a power of p.p\text{.} Each PP-conjugacy class contributes a positive power of pp toward ∣S∣|{\mathcal S}| except the equivalence class {P}.\{ P \}\text{.} Since ∣S∣|{\mathcal S}| is the sum of positive powers of pp and 1, ∣S∣≡1(modp).|{\mathcal S}| \equiv 1 \pmod{p}\text{.}

Now suppose that GG acts on S{\mathcal S} by conjugation. Since all Sylow pp-subgroups are conjugate, there can be only one orbit under this action. For P∈S,P \in {\mathcal S}\text{,}

∣S∣=∣orbit of P∣=[G:N(P)]\begin{equation*} |{\mathcal S}| = |\text{orbit of }P| = [G : N(P)] \end{equation*}

by Lemma 15.6. But [G:N(P)][G : N(P)] is a divisor of ∣G∣;|G|\text{;} consequently, the number of Sylow pp-subgroups of a finite group must divide the order of the group.

SubsectionHistorical Note

¶

Peter Ludvig Mejdell Sylow was born in 1832 in Christiania, Norway (now Oslo). After attending Christiania University, Sylow taught high school. In 1862 he obtained a temporary appointment at Christiania University. Even though his appointment was relatively brief, he influenced students such as Sophus Lie (1842–1899). Sylow had a chance at a permanent chair in 1869, but failed to obtain the appointment. In 1872, he published a 10-page paper presenting the theorems that now bear his name. Later Lie and Sylow collaborated on a new edition of Abel's works. In 1898, a chair at Christiania University was finally created for Sylow through the efforts of his student and colleague Lie. Sylow died in 1918.