Example16.20
For any integer we can define a ring homomorphism by This is indeed a ring homomorphism, since
and
The kernel of the homomorphism is
📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources
Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand
In the study of groups, a homomorphism is a map that preserves the operation of the group. Similarly, a homomorphism between rings preserves the operations of addition and multiplication in the ring. More specifically, if and are rings, then a is a map satisfying
for all If is a one-to-one and onto homomorphism, then is called an of rings.
The set of elements that a ring homomorphism maps to plays a fundamental role in the theory of rings. For any ring homomorphism we define the of a ring homomorphism to be the set
For any integer we can define a ring homomorphism by This is indeed a ring homomorphism, since
and
The kernel of the homomorphism is
Let be the ring of continuous real-valued functions on an interval as in Example 16.5. For a fixed we can define a ring homomorphism by This is a ring homomorphism since
Ring homomorphisms of the type are called .
In the next proposition we will examine some fundamental properties of ring homomorphisms. The proof of the proposition is left as an exercise.
Let be a ring homomorphism.
If is a commutative ring, then is a commutative ring.
Let and be the identities for and respectively. If is onto, then
If is a field and then is a field.
In group theory we found that normal subgroups play a special role. These subgroups have nice characteristics that make them more interesting to study than arbitrary subgroups. In ring theory the objects corresponding to normal subgroups are a special class of subrings called ideals. An in a ring is a subring of such that if is in and is in then both and are in that is, and for all
Every ring has at least two ideals, and These ideals are called the .
Let be a ring with identity and suppose that is an ideal in such that is in Since for any by the definition of an ideal,
If is any element in a commutative ring with identity, then the set
is an ideal in Certainly, is nonempty since both and are in The sum of two elements in is again in since The inverse of is Finally, if we multiply an element by an arbitrary element we have Therefore, satisfies the definition of an ideal.
If is a commutative ring with identity, then an ideal of the form is called a .
Every ideal in the ring of integers is a principal ideal.
The zero ideal is a principal ideal since If is any nonzero ideal in then must contain some positive integer There exists a least positive integer in by the Principle of Well-Ordering. Now let be any element in Using the division algorithm, we know that there exist integers and such that
where This equation tells us that but must be since is the least positive element in Therefore, and
The set is ideal in the ring of integers. If is in and is in then is in as required. In fact, by Theorem 16.25, these are the only ideals of
The kernel of any ring homomorphism is an ideal in
We know from group theory that is an additive subgroup of Suppose that and Then we must show that and are in However,
and
In our definition of an ideal we have required that and for all Such ideals are sometimes referred to as . We can also consider ; that is, we may require only that either or for hold but not both. Such ideals are called and , respectively. Of course, in a commutative ring any ideal must be two-sided. In this text we will concentrate on two-sided ideals.
Let be an ideal of The factor group is a ring with multiplication defined by
We already know that is an abelian group under addition. Let and be in We must show that the product is independent of the choice of coset; that is, if and then must be in Since there exists an element in such that Similarly, there exists a such that Notice that
and since is an ideal; consequently, We will leave as an exercise the verification of the associative law for multiplication and the distributive laws.
The ring in Theorem 16.29 is called the or . Just as with group homomorphisms and normal subgroups, there is a relationship between ring homomorphisms and ideals.
Let be an ideal of The map defined by is a ring homomorphism of onto with kernel
Certainly is a surjective abelian group homomorphism. It remains to show that works correctly under ring multiplication. Let and be in Then
which completes the proof of the theorem.
The map is often called the or . In ring theory we have isomorphism theorems relating ideals and ring homomorphisms similar to the isomorphism theorems for groups that relate normal subgroups and homomorphisms in Chapter 11. We will prove only the First Isomorphism Theorem for rings in this chapter and leave the proofs of the other two theorems as exercises. All of the proofs are similar to the proofs of the isomorphism theorems for groups.
Let be a ring homomorphism. Then is an ideal of If is the canonical homomorphism, then there exists a unique isomorphism such that
Let By the First Isomorphism Theorem for groups, there exists a well-defined group homomorphism defined by for the additive abelian groups and To show that this is a ring homomorphism, we need only show that but
Let be a subring of a ring and an ideal of Then is an ideal of and
Let be a ring and and be ideals of where Then
Let be an ideal of a ring Then is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of subrings containing and the set of subrings of Furthermore, the ideals of containing correspond to ideals of