Draft Forbes Group Website (Build by Nikola). The official site is hosted at:
License: GPL3
ubuntu2004
Single Particle in a Box
We start with a model of a single particle in a periodic box (Section III.A from [Kempe:2003]). Equation numbers correspond to [Kempe:2003.] The wavefunction is then simply a vector on our set of abscissa. This wavefunction lives in our original Hilbert space spanned by the basis of "position" eigenstates such that is the probability that the particle is on the th run of the ladder. The full quantum random walk problem lives in an axuilliary Hilbert space where is a two-dimensional Hilbert space spanned by two spin states , . The idea here is that motion up the ladder corresponds with being in the spin state while motion down the ladder corresponds to . The unitary evolution operator is thus:
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mat at position 18: …egin{gather} \̲m̲a̲t̲{S} = \ket{\ua}…Now we start from the state and evolve with the unitary evolution operator:
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mat at position 1: \̲m̲a̲t̲{U} = \mat{S}\c…Doing this 100 times, we obtain Fig. 5 from [Kempe:2003].
Starting from a symmetric initial condition we obtain Fig. 6. (It appears they forgot to normalize the initial state properly.)
MMF Note: Using the coin from (17) does not seem to give symmetric evolution like they claim... not sure why.
Let's look at the evolution now, anticipating a comparison with [Dadras:2018].
One can get a biased quantum walk by starting from a different initial state, or by using a different coin. In [Dadras:2018] they use a different coin. Try to reproduce their Fig. 2.