Book a Demo!
CoCalc Logo Icon
StoreFeaturesDocsShareSupportNewsAboutPoliciesSign UpSign In
Download

📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources

132928 views
License: OTHER
Kernel:
%%html <link href="http://mathbook.pugetsound.edu/beta/mathbook-content.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://aimath.org/mathbook/mathbook-add-on.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <style>.subtitle {font-size:medium; display:block}</style> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,400italic,600,600italic" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Inconsolata:400,700&subset=latin,latin-ext" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><!-- Hide this cell. --> <script> var cell = $(".container .cell").eq(0), ia = cell.find(".input_area") if (cell.find(".toggle-button").length == 0) { ia.after( $('<button class="toggle-button">Toggle hidden code</button>').click( function (){ ia.toggle() } ) ) ia.hide() } </script>

Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.

ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand

Section21.2Splitting Fields

Let FF be a field and p(x)p(x) be a nonconstant polynomial in F[x].F[x]\text{.} We already know that we can find a field extension of FF that contains a root of p(x).p(x)\text{.} However, we would like to know whether an extension EE of FF containing all of the roots of p(x)p(x) exists. In other words, can we find a field extension of FF such that p(x)p(x) factors into a product of linear polynomials? What is the “smallest” extension containing all the roots of p(x)?p(x)\text{?}

Let FF be a field and p(x)=a0+a1x++anxnp(x) = a_0 + a_1 x + \cdots + a_n x^n be a nonconstant polynomial in F[x].F[x]\text{.} An extension field EE of FF is a of p(x)p(x) if there exist elements α1,,αn\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n in EE such that E=F(α1,,αn)E = F( \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n ) and

p(x)=(xα1)(xα2)(xαn).\begin{equation*} p(x) = ( x - \alpha_1 )(x - \alpha_2) \cdots (x - \alpha_n). \end{equation*}

A polynomial p(x)F[x]p(x) \in F[x] in EE if it is the product of linear factors in E[x].E[x]\text{.}

Example21.29

Let p(x)=x4+2x28p(x) = x^4 + 2x^2 - 8 be in Q[x].{\mathbb Q}[x]\text{.} Then p(x)p(x) has irreducible factors x22x^2 -2 and x2+4.x^2 + 4\text{.} Therefore, the field Q(2,i){\mathbb Q}( \sqrt{2}, i ) is a splitting field for p(x).p(x)\text{.}

Example21.30

Let p(x)=x33p(x) = x^3 -3 be in Q[x].{\mathbb Q}[x]\text{.} Then p(x)p(x) has a root in the field Q(33).{\mathbb Q}( \sqrt[3]{3}\, )\text{.} However, this field is not a splitting field for p(x)p(x) since the complex cube roots of 3,

33±(36)5i2,\begin{equation*} \frac{ -\sqrt[3]{3} \pm (\sqrt[6]{3}\, )^5 i }{2}, \end{equation*}

are not in Q(33).{\mathbb Q}( \sqrt[3]{3}\, )\text{.}

Theorem21.31

Let p(x)F[x]p(x) \in F[x] be a nonconstant polynomial. Then there exists a splitting field EE for p(x).p(x)\text{.}

Proof

We will use mathematical induction on the degree of p(x).p(x)\text{.} If degp(x)=1,\deg p(x) = 1\text{,} then p(x)p(x) is a linear polynomial and E=F.E = F\text{.} Assume that the theorem is true for all polynomials of degree kk with 1k<n1 \leq k \lt n and let degp(x)=n.\deg p(x) = n\text{.} We can assume that p(x)p(x) is irreducible; otherwise, by our induction hypothesis, we are done. By Theorem 21.5, there exists a field KK such that p(x)p(x) has a zero α1\alpha_1 in K.K\text{.} Hence, p(x)=(xα1)q(x),p(x) = (x - \alpha_1)q(x)\text{,} where q(x)K[x].q(x) \in K[x]\text{.} Since degq(x)=n1,\deg q(x) = n -1\text{,} there exists a splitting field EKE \supset K of q(x)q(x) that contains the zeros α2,,αn\alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n of p(x)p(x) by our induction hypothesis. Consequently,

E=K(α2,,αn)=F(α1,,αn)\begin{equation*} E = K(\alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_n) = F(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n) \end{equation*}

is a splitting field of p(x).p(x)\text{.}

The question of uniqueness now arises for splitting fields. This question is answered in the affirmative. Given two splitting fields KK and LL of a polynomial p(x)F[x],p(x) \in F[x]\text{,} there exists a field isomorphism ϕ:KL\phi : K \rightarrow L that preserves F.F\text{.} In order to prove this result, we must first prove a lemma.

Lemma21.32

Let ϕ:EF\phi : E \rightarrow F be an isomorphism of fields. Let KK be an extension field of EE and αK\alpha \in K be algebraic over EE with minimal polynomial p(x).p(x)\text{.} Suppose that LL is an extension field of FF such that β\beta is root of the polynomial in F[x]F[x] obtained from p(x)p(x) under the image of ϕ.\phi\text{.} Then ϕ\phi extends to a unique isomorphism ϕ:E(α)F(β)\overline{\phi} : E( \alpha ) \rightarrow F( \beta ) such that ϕ(α)=β\overline{\phi}( \alpha ) = \beta and ϕ\overline{\phi} agrees with ϕ\phi on E.E\text{.}

Proof

If p(x)p(x) has degree n,n\text{,} then by Theorem 21.13 we can write any element in E(α)E( \alpha ) as a linear combination of 1,α,,αn1.1, \alpha, \ldots, \alpha^{n - 1}\text{.} Therefore, the isomorphism that we are seeking must be

ϕ(a0+a1α++an1αn1)=ϕ(a0)+ϕ(a1)β++ϕ(an1)βn1,\begin{equation*} \overline{\phi}( a_0 + a_1 \alpha + \cdots + a_{n - 1} \alpha^{n - 1}) = \phi(a_0) + \phi(a_1) \beta + \cdots + \phi(a_{n - 1}) \beta^{n - 1}, \end{equation*}

where

a0+a1α++an1αn1\begin{equation*} a_0 + a_1 \alpha + \cdots + a_{n - 1} \alpha^{n - 1} \end{equation*}

is an element in E(α).E(\alpha)\text{.} The fact that ϕ\overline{\phi} is an isomorphism could be checked by direct computation; however, it is easier to observe that ϕ\overline{\phi} is a composition of maps that we already know to be isomorphisms.

We can extend ϕ\phi to be an isomorphism from E[x]E[x] to F[x],F[x]\text{,} which we will also denote by ϕ,\phi\text{,} by letting

ϕ(a0+a1x++anxn)=ϕ(a0)+ϕ(a1)x++ϕ(an)xn.\begin{equation*} \phi( a_0 + a_1 x + \cdots + a_n x^n ) = \phi( a_0 ) + \phi(a_1) x + \cdots + \phi(a_n) x^n. \end{equation*}

This extension agrees with the original isomorphism ϕ:EF,\phi : E \rightarrow F\text{,} since constant polynomials get mapped to constant polynomials. By assumption, ϕ(p(x))=q(x);\phi(p(x)) = q(x)\text{;} hence, ϕ\phi maps p(x)\langle p(x) \rangle onto q(x).\langle q(x) \rangle\text{.} Consequently, we have an isomorphism ψ:E[x]/p(x)F[x]/q(x).\psi : E[x] / \langle p(x) \rangle \rightarrow F[x]/\langle q(x) \rangle\text{.} By Proposition 21.12, we have isomorphisms σ:E[x]/p(x)E(α)\sigma: E[x]/\langle p(x) \rangle \rightarrow E(\alpha) and τ:F[x]/q(x)F(β),\tau : F[x]/\langle q(x) \rangle \rightarrow F( \beta )\text{,} defined by evaluation at α\alpha and β,\beta\text{,} respectively. Therefore, ϕ=τψσ1\overline{\phi} = \tau \psi \sigma^{-1} is the required isomorphism.

We leave the proof of uniqueness as a exercise.

Theorem21.33

Let ϕ:EF\phi : E \rightarrow F be an isomorphism of fields and let p(x)p(x) be a nonconstant polynomial in E[x]E[x] and q(x)q(x) the corresponding polynomial in F[x]F[x] under the isomorphism. If KK is a splitting field of p(x)p(x) and LL is a splitting field of q(x),q(x)\text{,} then ϕ\phi extends to an isomorphism ψ:KL.\psi : K \rightarrow L\text{.}

Proof

We will use mathematical induction on the degree of p(x).p(x)\text{.} We can assume that p(x)p(x) is irreducible over E.E\text{.} Therefore, q(x)q(x) is also irreducible over F.F\text{.} If degp(x)=1,\deg p(x) = 1\text{,} then by the definition of a splitting field, K=EK = E and L=FL = F and there is nothing to prove.

Assume that the theorem holds for all polynomials of degree less than n.n\text{.} Since KK is a splitting field of p(x),p(x)\text{,} all of the roots of p(x)p(x) are in K.K\text{.} Choose one of these roots, say α,\alpha\text{,} such that EE(α)K.E \subset E( \alpha ) \subset K\text{.} Similarly, we can find a root β\beta of q(x)q(x) in LL such that FF(β)L.F \subset F( \beta) \subset L\text{.} By Lemma 21.32, there exists an isomorphism ϕ:E(α)F(β)\overline{\phi} : E(\alpha ) \rightarrow F( \beta) such that ϕ(α)=β\overline{\phi}( \alpha ) = \beta and ϕ\overline{\phi} agrees with ϕ\phi on E.E\text{.}

Now write p(x)=(xα)f(x)p(x) = (x - \alpha ) f(x) and q(x)=(xβ)g(x),q(x) = ( x - \beta) g(x)\text{,} where the degrees of f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x) are less than the degrees of p(x)p(x) and q(x),q(x)\text{,} respectively. The field extension KK is a splitting field for f(x)f(x) over E(α),E( \alpha)\text{,} and LL is a splitting field for g(x)g(x) over F(β).F( \beta )\text{.} By our induction hypothesis there exists an isomorphism ψ:KL\psi : K \rightarrow L such that ψ\psi agrees with ϕ\overline{\phi} on E(α).E( \alpha)\text{.} Hence, there exists an isomorphism ψ:KL\psi : K \rightarrow L such that ψ\psi agrees with ϕ\phi on E.E\text{.}

Corollary21.34

Let p(x)p(x) be a polynomial in F[x].F[x]\text{.} Then there exists a splitting field KK of p(x)p(x) that is unique up to isomorphism.