Example21.29
Let be in Then has irreducible factors and Therefore, the field is a splitting field for
📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources
Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand
Let be a field and be a nonconstant polynomial in We already know that we can find a field extension of that contains a root of However, we would like to know whether an extension of containing all of the roots of exists. In other words, can we find a field extension of such that factors into a product of linear polynomials? What is the “smallest” extension containing all the roots of
Let be a field and be a nonconstant polynomial in An extension field of is a of if there exist elements in such that and
A polynomial in if it is the product of linear factors in
Let be in Then has irreducible factors and Therefore, the field is a splitting field for
Let be in Then has a root in the field However, this field is not a splitting field for since the complex cube roots of 3,
are not in
Let be a nonconstant polynomial. Then there exists a splitting field for
We will use mathematical induction on the degree of If then is a linear polynomial and Assume that the theorem is true for all polynomials of degree with and let We can assume that is irreducible; otherwise, by our induction hypothesis, we are done. By Theorem 21.5, there exists a field such that has a zero in Hence, where Since there exists a splitting field of that contains the zeros of by our induction hypothesis. Consequently,
is a splitting field of
The question of uniqueness now arises for splitting fields. This question is answered in the affirmative. Given two splitting fields and of a polynomial there exists a field isomorphism that preserves In order to prove this result, we must first prove a lemma.
Let be an isomorphism of fields. Let be an extension field of and be algebraic over with minimal polynomial Suppose that is an extension field of such that is root of the polynomial in obtained from under the image of Then extends to a unique isomorphism such that and agrees with on
If has degree then by Theorem 21.13 we can write any element in as a linear combination of Therefore, the isomorphism that we are seeking must be
where
is an element in The fact that is an isomorphism could be checked by direct computation; however, it is easier to observe that is a composition of maps that we already know to be isomorphisms.
We can extend to be an isomorphism from to which we will also denote by by letting
This extension agrees with the original isomorphism since constant polynomials get mapped to constant polynomials. By assumption, hence, maps onto Consequently, we have an isomorphism By Proposition 21.12, we have isomorphisms and defined by evaluation at and respectively. Therefore, is the required isomorphism.
We leave the proof of uniqueness as a exercise.
Let be an isomorphism of fields and let be a nonconstant polynomial in and the corresponding polynomial in under the isomorphism. If is a splitting field of and is a splitting field of then extends to an isomorphism
We will use mathematical induction on the degree of We can assume that is irreducible over Therefore, is also irreducible over If then by the definition of a splitting field, and and there is nothing to prove.
Assume that the theorem holds for all polynomials of degree less than Since is a splitting field of all of the roots of are in Choose one of these roots, say such that Similarly, we can find a root of in such that By Lemma 21.32, there exists an isomorphism such that and agrees with on
Now write and where the degrees of and are less than the degrees of and respectively. The field extension is a splitting field for over and is a splitting field for over By our induction hypothesis there exists an isomorphism such that agrees with on Hence, there exists an isomorphism such that agrees with on
Let be a polynomial in Then there exists a splitting field of that is unique up to isomorphism.